You must of not read what i posted than. I posted that bob edited his post...

that 5. You quoted. Originaly Was the option for 3..... So Ya it confused alot. When he edited. Some voted 3 cause they thought everyone gets one. Some voted 3 after he edited cause they wanted middle ground.

We also had no idea what decreasion he was going to use for middle ground. If your going to make a vote atleast let the people voting understand what they vote for.

P.S. I think there should be a revote with a better voting discription.

I dont see a reason why we can not have a revote since we now better understand what we are voting for since it wasnt properly discribed. Unless the full intentions of bob was to not give anyone a alpaca. Which would prove my theory right.

_________________

middle is middle I picked 3 meaning some may or may not get one. O wells.

_________________
Scathach of Skye - Pure Ranger

People where confused. All im asking for is a new vote with more descriptive options that we know the outcome of. I dont see a reason why we cannot have one. Unless bob would not like people to have alpaca's which would contradict what he says about greed.

_________________

Jeez, dude..

_________________
Ultima avatar: The Famed JIZABOZ,GWAR Guildmeister

^
*You see Echo click the LIKE button*

*clicks Dislike Button*

xD

_________________

lol... yes I see your point, however Bob didn't edit his post deliberately to mislead people.

I once saw Bob on his former player account putting about 2 million in gold IN THE BIN (!) because he'd found a bug to dupe gold. He isn't the kind of person to act dishonestly.

He no doubt (as I've done many times) revised his post shortly after originally making it, but it was too late - some people had already voted.

Bob even commented that it was surprising how quick people were to enter this 'incentive' and vote in comparison to their eagerness to offer the same proactivity in helping the shard.

While I understand that some of you are disappointed, in the scheme of the shard it really is a small material item so it isn't that important compared to all the work that Bob has done here.

What I will perhaps do as a compromise is introduce one or two as event prizes in the near future. That would give those who missed out a further opportunity to win one.

_________________
Thassius
"Blessed are the noobs, for they shall inherit Obsidian" - Thassius

The thing is we didnt miss out on it. Its different if we posted after his 24 hour mark. But for the people that actively play this shard and posted within 1 day of his post should be compinsated, instead we were punished by not getting one and watching others get one and being tricked by the one we should be able to trust most. If its such a small materialistic item there shouldent be a problem giving it to the people who did just what he asked and even did it correctly.

Anyways i ask for a revote now that we know just what kind of choices he is going to make. I dont see a reason why this would be denied unless he is truley not wanting to give the players a "FAIR" chance which he is always stridding for.

_________________

I can't believe this discussion is still going on. I say f*** it and move on.

^^^^ that is exactly why america is broken! You cant move on from problems, you have to fix them right away before they escalate and get worse!

_________________

What's the problem you want an alpaca and can't have one? You are starting to sound like raptor ffs. Better get the FBI involved buddy they will get you your alpaca.

TO LATE! I ALREADY DID! HES MOST WANTED NOW!

_________________

LMFAOOOOOOO

you put time into that..................................................................

_________________
king of the run on sentence.

hahaha... time theft, sounds like raptor

_________________

Only Albert has the time for something like this lol.