I think Gold Armour Gives to much armour compared to other types for its quality level. Its as good as my valorite. Yet valorite is way harder to get was wondering if it could be fixed.

_________________

doesnt it depend on each piece of armor dependint on they + bonuses
you can item id gold armor to see how good they are but yeah good gold armor are good.. its kinda gamble with them
too good ? i dont know
if its realy as good as valo then yeah.. its alot..

I thought this was intentional, was it not? I've always like the idea of gold armours being quite robust - but as yet no-one has managed to get the look quite right, either not flash enough or kinda ugly looking like a rainbow shard/runUO-type "AHHHH" colour!

_________________
Miner/Smith/Lumberjack/Carpenter/Cartographer
Alchemist/Fisherman/Tamer/Warrior/Daemon

I always thought that once you Item ID'd the armor that it because stronger. So naturally it would, if one was able to ID it its highest + point, than it in theory would be as strong as Valorite.

I also thought this was intentional. Is gold the only armor that can be ID'd? Would be nice to see other armors IDable, maybe like Shadow armor.

I think its pretty dumb. Why have an easy to obtain armor be as strong as one of the best?
Makes no sense. It has no cons. Maybe if it broke very easily since gold is a soft metal.

Doesn't gold already break easier than the other armors already. I swear gold lasts like a day if that.

No gold armour lasts long. Also Gold and Bronze is like the only type of armour that can be Item Id which is kinda dumb.

_________________

Well it is dumb that only gold and bronze can be ID, but we should not allow it for all the armors.

What I suggest we allow be Item ID (in terms of armor) are:

Platemail
Bronze
Rusty
Gold
and Shadow

Anything above seems pointless in my opinion. It should only be the lower armors that can be ID.